Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« T-Mobile to Launch IPWireless, Flarion Could Win in Finland | Main | Finland Chooses Flarion »
David Pogue writes about EVDO in the New York Times: But his column is several months late to the mainstream media coverage of this cell data technology. It’s also a little scanty on two important issues. First, EVDO isn’t national yet, although it’s getting there. EDGE may be slower, but it’s available fairly universally from Cingualr. Second, he mentions in a parenthetical paragraph that upload speeds are poor, but he cites the 100 Kbps estimate given by Verizon and doesn’t list a test upload speed as he does for download late in the story. I’ve heard that 50 Kbps is a more typical average upload speed.
Seattle is the latest city to get Verizon’s EVDO service starting today, reports The Seattle Times.
Posted by Glennf at June 23, 2005 7:15 AM
Categories: EVDO
TrackBack URL for this entry: